Mandegar Farzami vs Ayline Esina Samardzic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Sep at 05:17 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Farzami vs A. Esina Samardzic

IRI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Farzami 1 - 0 Samardzic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mandegar Farzami winning 2 and Ayline Esina Samardzic winning 0. The last match between Mandegar Farzami and Ayline Esina Samardzic was at the W15 Kayseri, 05-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Mandegar Farzami getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Farzami | 1 |
| Samardzic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Kayseri(09-05-25)
M. Farzami vs A. E. Samardzic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.61% (16-15) | Career Total W/L | 35.80% (63-113) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Farzami vs A. E. Samardzic Match Preview:
- How do the players compare in recent second serve performance? Farzami has a slight edge, winning 35.19% of second serve points, compared to 32.29% by Samardzic.
- Which player exhibits stronger return game stats in recent form? Samardzic has the upper hand on opponent's second serve returns, winning 52.32% of those points, while Farzami wins 49.47%.
- Farzami leads Samardzic on first serve returns, winning 35.51% compared to 28.69% for Samardzic.
- Under pressure, break point save percentages are nearly identical with Farzami at 46.32% and Samardzic at 46.15%.
- Farzami has a higher overall match-winning percentage over the last year, winning 53.85% of matches, whereas Samardzic has won 47.73%.
- Which surface do both players excel on? Farzami shines on Hard surfaces with a 78% win percentage, while Samardzic has a 46% win percentage on Hard surfaces.
- Interestingly, Farzami faces tougher competition with opponents having an average rank of 179.54, whereas Samardzic's opponents have an average rank of 258.95.
- Samardzic shows a significant advantage in deciding set performances, winning 67% compared to Farzami's 33%.
- Samardzic is more effective in converting breakpoints, converting 42.5% of opportunities against Farzami's 36.84%.
Editorial Prediction (September 5, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the likely outcome of this match, it's important to balance various factors such as recent performance, surface preferences, and competitive levels faced by each player.
Farzami exhibits strengths in second serve performance and first serve returns, giving him an edge in regular play. He faces tougher opposition, which may sharpen his competitive edge.
Samardzic, however, excels in return of second serves and breakpoint conversion, indicating a strong ability to capitalize on opponents’ weaknesses. He also shows resilience in deciding sets.
Given the data and current form, Samardzic appears to have the upper hand in converting crucial points and demonstrating resilience. Therefore, Samardzic is most likely to win this upcoming tennis match.
Mandegar Farzami vs Ayline Esina Samardzic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Farzami vs A. E. Samardzic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:46:5 | Average Match Time | 1:46:5 |
| 82% (63/77) | 1st Serve % | 21% (11/52) |
| 57% (36/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 29% (4/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (9/41) |
| 80% (8/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (6/12) |
| 73% (38/52) | Return Points Win % | 48% (37/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Farzami Recent Matches Played
A. E. Samardzic Recent Matches Played

M. Farzami vs A. E. Samardzic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.61% (16/15) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.80% (63/113) |
| 52.31% (34/31) | Sets Win/Loss | 36.57% (143/248) |
| 52.29% (297/271) | Games Win/Loss | 43.76% (1543/1983) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.63% (47/56) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 23.21% (13/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 17.65% (3/14) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 4 | Aces Total | 120 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.53 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 910 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 185.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 294.14 |
| 74% (807/1090) | 1st Serve % | 51% (3331/6522) |
| 58% (471/807) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1922/3331) |
| 42% (119/283) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (1092/3191) |
| 53% (71/133) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (367/766) |
| 48% (520/1086) | Return Points Win % | 45% (2875/6350) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 25.45% (14/41) |
| 51.61% (16/15) | Futures W/L | 40.50% (49/72) |
| 52% (16/31) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (63/174) |
| 67% (4/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (7/17) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (24/41) |
| 100% (16/16) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (60/56) |
| 0% (16/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (60/4) |
| 0% (15/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (116/7) |